Germany: Boom in Timber market caused by biofuel demand

Germany is currently experiencing a boom in the timber market. The high demand for timber can mainly be attributed to bio-energy generators which are receiving high garantied income through the renewable energy act. According to the act, electricity generated from biomass and fed into the grid system is being rewarded with between 7.7 and 11.67 Euro Cent per KW/hour depending on the total capacity the facility. A bonus of 2.6 Euro Cent comes on top of that when timber as a re-growing resource is used.  This made it highly attractive to invest in timber burning power stations in recent years. In addition, wood pellet heating systems became attractive to German home owners as an alternative to expensive oil and gas heating systems. Due to the high growth in the biomass sector, this resource became scarcer recently. Biomass facilities burn fresh timber, matured timber as well as organic waste like leaves.  As a consequence, even tree parts that weren't used before for burning such like tree root systems, bark and branches are now considered for energy generation with considerable consequences as these parts are not only valuable nutrient for forest soils but also important for the soil's water storage capacity. In addition, more and more tree parts with high water contents are also being used which inevitably will negatively impact on plant efficiency. The <h2>demand for timber grew by 23% from 2006 to 2007,<h2> with a total of 76.7 million cubic meters being harvested. Limited supply of timber let the price per solid cubic meter timber double from 30 Euro in 2003 and is now also affecting other sectors such as the pulp industry in Germany. One can easily imagine that timber needs to be imported to still the growing hunger for wood in Germany which will further decrease the positive effect of energy from biomass on climate. Issues with soil depletion and the tight timber market require urgently new concepts to satisfy the hunger for re-growing resources and to maintain sustainable forestry in Germany.

Comments [0]

World-Wide: Challenging REDD's overly broad definition of forest

"The definition of forests under REDD is utterly ridiculous", stated Sandy Gauntlett, a Maori indigenous rights activist from New Zealand, and representative of  Global Forest Coalition.  "It leaves wide open the ability of countries to destroy their natural forests and replace them with industrial tree plantations-which destroys wildlife habitat and displaces indigenous and forest dependent communities.  Global Forest Coalition, The Wilderness Society, World Rainforest Movement, Global Justice Ecology Project, Via Campesina, the International Youth Delegation and the STOP GE Trees Campaign united today to challenge the UN/REDD definition of forests. Currently the UN considers industrial tree plantations as forests.  This is, simply put, an egregious error.  Plantations are not forests.  Forests are diverse ecosystems and plantations are void of biodiversity.  The UN definition endangers Indigenous Peoples, forest dependent people, peasants, small farmers, biodiversity and exacerbates climate change. The groups held a media conference this morning and several actions occurred on the theme of calling on the UNFCCC to change the definition of forests so it distinguishes between native forests and plantations. "We have united to challenge the definition of forest under the UNFCCC to ensure that agricultural tree crops, or plantations are not defined as a forest", said Gemma Tillack, an international youth delegate and campaigner for The Wilderness Society in Australia. "The conversion of native forests to plantations is bad for biodiversity, people and the climate. Human rights, especially women's rights, are being violated where there are plantations, and they should not be defined as forests.  In addition, industrial tree plantations impact the climate--tropical forests and grasslands store significantly more carbon than tree plantations", said Ana Filippini from World Rainforest Movement (Uruguay) and member of the GenderCC Network - Women for Climate Justice. "Schemes such as REDD allow companies to prevent family farmers from using the land to produce the food that is needed to feed their communities and their countries", said Luis Muchanga of Via Campesina in Mozambique.  He continued,  "Deforestation, which is a major driver of global warming, is not made by peasants and indigenous peoples, but by large companies that are given the right to convert the forest to tree plantations". The groups are proposing that the definitions are changed so: 1) Forests are defined as 'a terrestrial ecosystem generated and maintained primarily through natural and ecological and evolutionary processes that are home to most of the world's biodiversity'. 2) Plantations are defined as a crop of trees planted and regularly harvested by humans that do not provide habitat for biodiversity.

Comments [0]

Uganda: Army will help save forests or a hidden agenda?

Three weeks ago the minister of Water and Environment, Hon Maria Mutagamba announced plans to set up tight security to curb environmental crime in Uganda. She said her ministry, in conjunction with that of Defence have designed a White Paper to be presented to the cabinet for discussion before the force is put in place. The special task force that will be known as the National Environment Police (NEPO) is to be created from the police. Muhwezi says the nature of environmental crimes requires that officers are trained in the technical aspects of the environment and provided with mentoring and coaching by a technical environmental arm of government. However this is the issue that is seriously contested by deferent stake holders in the sector. But Anywar, insists NEPO is unnecessary. "I don't think that is the way forward, have they exhausted other avenues?" she asks. She instead points an accusing finger to the "untouchables" for destroying the environment. "If we take a look at the data of those who are destroying the environment, it is the government officials," she says, adding, "I was very surprised when Maria Mutagamba said they are going to take on those who are clearing the forests and wet-lands. Why couldn't she point out those individuals who are clearing our forests?" According to Mr. Onesmus Muhwezi the director of environment monitoring and compliance at National Environment Management Authority (NEMA), NEPO is being instituted to meet the challenges of the times. "Environmental degradation and associated climate change impacts have become a global and human rights issue.  The current industrialization drive by the government of Uganda poses a big challenge to maintaining a clean and healthy environment." Critics of this plan say this could be a plot by the government to either secure the forests to serve their own land needs or protect them from likely infiltration by rebels. "Museveni is the kayungirizi for land in Uganda, he has to identify the land," said Beatrice Anywar, the shadow minister for environment. She adds, "President Museveni understands bushes in a different perspective. Every bush he sees is a potential hideout for rebels. But why not, he came to power through the bush." Muhwezi advances several reasons for the formation of NEPO. He says the public is now keen on the state of the environment that they live in. "Reporting of environmental crimes by the general public has increased dramatically in the recent past," he said, "unfortunately, the response to reports is less successful due to the time lag between when an incident is reported and when action is taken. http://www.independent.co.ug/index.php/news/news-analysis/116-news-analysis/577-army-to-protect-forests-but-critics-claim-hidden-agenda.html

Comments [0]

Sudan: Darfur genocide ravages forests too

Sudan's Darfur conflict has devastated the environment in the region, stripping forests and destroying farmland, according to a U.N. report. People caught up in the five-year crisis have cut down large areas of woodland, partly to feed a booming war-fuelled construction industry, said a report by the U.N.'s Environment Programme (UNEP) seen by Reuters on Wednesday. Tree cover has become so sparse in some areas that Darfuris often have to travel more than 75 km (50 miles) from their camps to find enough wood to sell or use for fuel, it added. "We're now seeing extreme stress on the environment around many of the camps and the major towns in Darfur," said UNEP's Sudan country director Clive Bates in a statement. "We need to plant millions of trees and introduce new technologies for construction and energy as quickly as humanly possible." The UNEP report said demand for wood in Darfur's three main towns El Fasher, Nyala and El Geneina had increased an estimated "two to three times" since the conflict started in 2003. Numbers of saw-mills and wood-fired brick kilns have rocketed in the region's main towns to keep up with rising demand for building materials for new peacekeeping bases, displacement shelters and accommodation for U.N. staff, the report added. It said brick-making kilns alone were burning up an estimated 52,000 trees a year, which meant "the current form of brick-making is having a disastrous impact on Darfur's fragile environment". "The brick kilns are occupying and in many cases destroying valuable agricultural land by digging up clay soils around towns," the report added. Farmers driven from their fields by the conflict often found the timber trade was the only business left open to them after taking shelter in displacement camps, said the report titled 'Destitution, distortion and deforestation'. International experts say more than 2.5 million people have been driven from their homes since mostly non-Arab rebels took up arms against the government in 2003, accusing Khartoum of neglecting the remote western region. http://africa.reuters.com/top/news/usnJOE4B909K.html

Comments [0]

World-Wide: Is speciesbanking.com another wrong way REDD?

Ecosystem Marketplace, a site that provides information on markets and payment schemes for ecosystem services, has launched what it is calling the "first information clearinghouse" for the species credit trading industry. Speciesbanking.com  will provide a marketplace for the emerging conservation banking market. It will initially focus on U.S. deals but hopes to eventually expand into other countries as markets develop. "SpeciesBanking.com will serve as a platform for conservation bank owners to publicize credit availability, credit buyers to find solutions to their mitigation needs, and prospective bank developers to research current market conditions," said Ecosystem Marketplace in a statement. "It will also allow agency staff to learn about activities outside their jurisdictions, and academics, investors, and others to monitor and analyze industry trends."  "The ultimate goal of speciesbanking.com is to facilitate species credit trading as an effective tool for the conservation of threatened and endangered species and their habitat." Conservation banks are a market response to regulations limiting development due to environmental concerns. The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service explains on its web site: Conservation banks are permanently protected privately or publicly owned lands that are managed for endangered, threatened, and other at-risk species. A conservation bank is like a biological bank account. Instead of money, the bank owner has habitat or species credits to sell. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) approves habitat or species credits based on the natural resource values on the bank lands. In exchange for permanently protecting the bank lands and managing them for listed and other at-risk species, conservation bank owners may sell credits to developers or others who need to compensate for the environmental impacts of their projects. http://news.mongabay.com/2008/1209-speciesbanking.html

Comments [0]

World-Wide: Striking Indigneous rights from REDD language protested

Green groups accused the US, Australia, New Zealand and Canada of deleting a line about indigenous peoples' rights from a draft agreement due to have been published tonight, as part of UN talks on climate change. The original confidential draft, seen by the Guardian, talked of "noting the rights and importance of engaging indigenous peoples and other local communities". The amended version mentions only "recognising the need to promote the full and effective participation of indigenous and local communities". The change sparked protests at the Poznan meeting by delegates representing indigenous groups from Panama and the US. Campaigners said the suggested change would leave indigenous people across the world vulnerable to exploitation under proposals to pay tropical nations not to cut down forests. A joint statement from groups including Friends of the Earth and the Rainforest Foundation condemned the change as "totally unacceptable". It said: "The forests being targetted... are those which indigenous peoples have sustained and protected for thousands of years. The rights of forest peoples to continue playing this role, and being rewarded for doing so, has to be recognised." Talks continue, but the row threatens to derail attempts to agree a rulebook for forest-protection schemes, which was supposed to have paved the way to include them in a new global climate deal to succeed the Kyoto protocol. Deforestation causes almost a fifth of greenhouse gas emissions. Negotiators had said such an agreement on forests was one of the few breakthroughs expected at the Poznan talks, which are largely a preparatory meeting for more serious negotiations next year. http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/dec/09/forests-climatechange

Comments [0]

UK: Ancient forest cleared for 2012 Olympics road use

The Weymouth relief road aims to ease traffic around Weymouth and Portland, which are hosting the Olympic sailing. "We have accelerated the relevant paperwork and work to clear the narrow strip of coppice will now restart on Thursday 11 December," a county council spokeswoman said. A legal bid by The Woodland Trust halted work at Two Mile Coppice a day after clearance work began on Monday. Dorset County Council said the work would now restart on Thursday after "reaching an agreement" with the trust. The Weymouth relief road aims to ease traffic around Weymouth and Portland, which are hosting the Olympic sailing. "We have accelerated the relevant paperwork and work to clear the narrow strip of coppice will now restart on Thursday 11 December," a county council spokeswoman said. Environmental groups lost a High Court legal bid to stop the road in 2007. Work on the road is due to start in spring 2009, if the Department for Transport (DfT) decides the project is value for money by the end of the year. Trees and other vegetation were being removed from woodland on the western edge of Two Mile Coppice, when Tuesday's legal challenge halted work. The coppice contains trees dating back 400 years, but the county council said they were only in a 0.4 acre (0.15 hectare) area - less than a tenth of the total woodland. Earlier, the council's natural environment manager, Phil Sterling, said: "We are losing a small area of ancient woodland, but overall this route offers the most possibilities to ease the effect of the road on local wildlife.

Comments [0]

Wuerthner: Dry forest restoration

We critically examine the hypothesis that dry forests in southern British Columbia evolved in the context of a low-severity fire-dominated disturbance regime, that fire suppression has led to ecological conditions which are radically different from the past, and that ''restoration'' initiatives are required to re-establish former ecological conditions. Four sources of information were used to infer historic disturbance regimes and forest condition and to quantify the nature of disturbance since the early 1900s: (1) patterns of annual and seasonal weather and lightning strikes, (2) topographic variability, (3) records of wildfire, insect attack, and timber harvesting practices, and (4) early systematic forest surveys. Our analyses consistently indicate that historic natural disturbances were likely diverse and episodic at multiple spatial and temporal scales. High seasonal and annual variability in weather and the number of lightning strikes in complex topography suggest that a widespread low-severity fire regime is very unlikely, with a mixed-severity disturbance regime more consistent with our analyses. Although the nature of disturbance has changed from one largely dominated by fire and insect attack historically to
harvesting and insect attack since 1950, the area disturbed annually has not diminished. Several interacting factors including climate, extensive fires coincident with European settlement, harvesting, fire suppression and insect attack have been key drivers in creating the conditions observed today. A complex, mixed-severity disturbance regime creates uncertainty about what represents ''natural'' forest conditions, orwhat the target conditions for restoration activities are if the objective is to ''restore natural conditions''. We conclude that dry forest ecosystems in British Columbia typically experienced mixed- severity disturbance regimes that included fire, bark beetles and defoliators. Trying to ''restore'' these forests with applications of frequent, low-severity fire is not an ecologically sound objective over large areas. Landscape management should focus onmaintaining forest heterogeneity thatwould have existed historically under a mixed-severity disturbance regime.

(download)

Comments [0]

World-Wide: Petition to honr indigenous rights related to REDD

INDIGENOUS PEOPLES, LOCAL COMMUNITIES AND NGOs OUTRAGED AT THE REMOVAL OF RIGHTS FROM UNFCCC DECISION ON REDD We, the undersigned representatives of indigenous peoples, local communities and non-governmental organizations monitoring the progress of negotiations in Poznan are outraged that the United States, Canada, Australia and New Zealand opposed the inclusion of recognition of the rights of indigenous peoples and local communities in a decision on REDD (Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation) drafted today by government delegates at the UN Climate Conference. Photo and more http://globaljusticeecology.org/

Comments [0]

World-Wide: Incredibly complex policy formulation process for REDD

I found myself sitting on the floor with John O. Niles Monday evening in front of a bank of computers just outside the Elk Room. He was walking me through a two-day-old draft decision document on deforestation from a technical working group, which was busy debating the latest draft inside. "For people like me who follow this process, this is like crack," Niles joked, hardly taking a breath between a series of explanations that rolled off his tongue in a passionate, yet controlled, manner. "They had a huge argument about semicolons versus colons versus commas." "That's awesome," I ventured, enthused by his enthusiasm. He concurred: "It's really awesome." John O. Niles (also known as John-O) heads the Tropical Forest Group, one of those non-profit groups that keeps everybody on their toes by poring over every sentence that comes out of every meeting, with particular attention to things like punctuation. He pulled out another document under consideration within the Elk Room, an early draft proposed for a vote by all delegates at the conference. "It's a 510 word sentence," he said, this time disappointed. "There's only one period, right there at the end." A week earlier, Niles had issued a press release saying the deforestation talks a were in danger of a meltdown, due in large part, he explained, to confusion about goals and process - as well as a little obstinacy on the part of Brazil and others. Similar reports were still circulating when I talked to him, but he seemed buoyed by the possibility that negotiators in the advisory group were at last on track to achieve an agreement on some of the technical details (say, how to measure and track carbon emissions from deforestation) and lay out a schedule for finishing things up next year. The language was close; he was picking bones with small – but perhaps critical – choices of wording. To help me understand all of this, Niles drew a diagram to illustrate all of the parallel negotiations under way. First came the 1992 United Nations Conference on Climate Change; the Kyoto Protocol constituted the first major agreement under the convention. Kyoto signatories have one group on a successor treaty, but a second, parallel group was created to continue negotiations with the United States, which bowed out. A third track, dubbed the Ad Hoc Working Group, would create a separate protocol under the convention. But US opposition to various proposals on the table again led to a second ad hoc working group that included US negotiators. Confused yet? "This is not one meeting - this is six meetings. They all move together," Niles says. "Even seasoned diplomats are saying, like, 'This is really incredibly complex.'"http://blogs.nature.com/news/blog/2008/12/poznan_deforestation_through_t_1.html

Comments [0]

About

Forest Policy Research